Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Submission to Tesco Public Inquiry
Introduction
1.1. Hale End & Highams Park ward is the area in the London Borough of Waltham Forest most affected by the proposals for a Tesco store on the former C & A site off Larkshall Road, Highams Park and the store’s location would itself be (just) within the ward boundary (see ward profile below). Most of Highams Park is located in the Hale End & Highams Park ward, although there is a substantial area in Hatch Lane ward and other parts in Larkswood ward and Chapel End ward.
1.2. Each of the 20 wards in Waltham Forest is represented by 3 councillors. I have undertaken the task of attending the Tesco Inquiry, but have of course regularly discussed the matter with my 2 fellow councillors.
1.3. From the time when the idea of a store was first reported, we, as local representatives, have sought the views of residents at regular intervals and encouraged people to contact us on this issue, whatever their views – by writing, phone or e-mail.
1.4. When the Public Inquiry was announced, I wrote (again) to the Planning Inspectorate in June of last year (20.6.06.), summarising the issues as we see them and indicating that I would want to attend the Public Inquiry and speak. This latest letter was acknowledged by the Planning Inspectorate on 27.6.06. (ref. APP/U5930/V/06/1198917).
1.5. I must emphasise that I see it as my task to represent the views of my constituents, which are very varied. There are local concerns, which we as local councillors share, about the implications of the scheme if it goes ahead and I shall refer to these issues in due course.
2. The Process
2.1. In my letter in June, I welcomed the prospect of a Public Inquiry as an opportunity for local people to have their say.
2.2. I regret that the format of a Public Inquiry (not a criticism of this Inquiry so much as of how the system
works in practice) is not exactly “user friendly” and can be perceived as rather intimidating, legalistic, etc.
2.3. Neverthleless, I hope all local people wishing to speak will be listened to and their differing views fully taken into account.
2.4. This Inquiry is perhaps unusual in that the applicant and the Council are “on the same side” and local residents who are opposed to the scheme hope that the outcome is not “a done deal”. It is not just a question of what “conditions” may be appropriate; for them the issue is whether or not this is a suitable location for such a development at all.
3. Local Opinion
3.1. When the possibility of a Tesco store was first reported in the local press in 2002, some residents were already concerned and contacted us.
At that stage, the Council replied to our request for information that “the Council has not received any proposals by Tesco, or indeed any developer, for the construction of a store on the above site.” Indeed at that stage the site was “currently designated as a Main Industrial Zone; the relevant policy - - encourages general industry, business uses and warehousing, but not retailing.”
3.2. In September, 2003, when the proposals were becoming a reality, our ward newsletter carried a survey under the headline: “Tesco – is it wanted in Highams Park?”. As we predicted, opinions in Highams Park are very sharply divided on this issue. There was a very narrow majority in favour of a Tesco store, but lots of concerns.
RESULTS OF SURVEY:
In favour of a Tesco store: 53% Against: 47%
Those who think such a development would be a threat to the viability of Highams Park shops: 60%
Those who think it would not be a threat: 36%
Don’t know: 4%
[NB this means that several who would welcome a Tesco store agree that it might harm H.Pk. shops]
Effect on future shopping patterns:
Would shop solely/mainly at Tesco: 30%
-- solely/mainly at H.Pk. shops 26%
-- both at Tesco & Highams Park 43%
-- elsewhere 28%
[some respondents chose more than one option – e.g. Tesco & elsewhere; so figures total more than 100]
POINTS IN FAVOUR
Convenience; choice; cheaper; local employment; would bring in people
PARTICULAR CONCERNS
Traffic & road safety; probability of local shop closures; loss of character in H.Pk.
Selection of comments:
“It would be very convenient for me – I would be delighted.”
“Tesco’s kills communities. All that gets left is second hand shops & fast food joints.”
“I think a big store in Highams Park would bring more trade to other shops and put Higha,ms Park on the map again for shopping like years ago.”
“We especially disapprove of more housing which will mean more pressure on schools, GPs, dentists, police, etc.”
“A development to be welcomed which would really bring Highams Park alive.”
“Encouraging more traffic constantly in and out of Tesco’s – is going to make Highams Park, if allowed, into one enormous traffic jam.”
3.3. The results of this survey were reported in January, 2004 (extracts above):
3.4. Since that survey, people have regularly contacted us with their views and we have encouraged them to do so.
3.5. It is clear from all the letters, reply-slips, surgery visits, phone-calls, conversations, e-mails, that opinion remains very divided - and it appears evenly divided - within the ward.
3.6. Recently, however, I have received a petition with 55 signatures in favour of a Tesco store. (Not all ward residents, but I do not consider that significant).
3.7. I have received a report of a residents’ meeting in the Vincent Road area. This says that opinion at that meeting was divided, about 50:50.
In favour of Tesco
4.1. Many local residents consider that there is a poor range of shops at Highams Park and some do not have a high opinion of the choice, range of goods and prices at existing (smaller) local supermarkets.
4.2. Consequently, many choose to go elsewhere to do their shopping.
4.3. They would welcome the convenience and positive benefits they believe a Tesco store would bring.
4.4. They point out that Tesco would bring choice, more favourable pricing and a much improved range of goods.
4.5. A Tesco store would bring local employment opportunities.
4.6. For those nearest to the site, they would welcome the chance to walk to a local large store.
4.7. Others would welcome the chance to park by the store and load up with their shopping.
4.8. Some – but not all of these – believe there would be a positive impact on the local shopping centre.
Opposing Tesco
5.1. There are already Tesco stores – quite apart from other large stores – only a mile or two away. To travel to these by car takes traffic away from the already congested centre of Highams Park.
5.2. There have been a good number of cases in the press where the arrival of a large store has had a very negative effect on the local shopping centre with loss of trade and business closures.
5.3. There are serious concerns about implications for traffic with the cars and lorries turning into and out of the site in such close proximity to the level crossing and road junctions where there are already sometimes long queues of traffic. Whatever schemes might be adopted, there is no denying that MORE cars will be drawn into Highams Park and exacerbate existing problems.
5.4. Queuing or very slow moving traffic is a major cause of pollution. It must be remembered that there are increasing rates of asthma in this country.
5.5. The idea that so many people will choose to walk to Tesco and carry shopping home is optimistic. In practice they may well find it more convenient to take the car and “load up”.
5.6. There are local concerns that some trees will be lost.
Other issue
6.1. People ask : IF the scheme were allowed, what could Tesco give back to the local community in helping with the traffic issues and perhaps providing community and/or leisure facilities??
Local knowledge
7.1. It cannot be expected that even expert witnesses will have the local knowledge of local people. Examples from the Inquiry to date:
Ø it is simply not the case that traffic moves away quickly when the crossing gates go up, particularly at peak times
Ø the possibility and convenience for local residents of reaching the Tesco store on the Southend Road (Woodford Green branch) by main roads in a short time had not been appreciated
Ø it is not considered locally that the practice of overtaking the queue for the level crossing (with gates down) in order to turn right into The Broadway is a safe procedure. Anyone stepping on to the pedestrian crossing near James Yard by the Guardian offices cannot easily see or be seen if traffic is overtaking
Ø The Tesco store in Ponders End - which could be available to residents particularly in NW Chingford after a drive of a mile or two – was not shown on the map.
7.2. The point here is simply to underlne the fact that the views of local residents, whatever their standpoint, do need to be listened to and heeded.
Matters arising from the Inquiry to date
8.1. Despite the large amount of evidence and the wealth of statistics, some of the assertions being made are not entirely convincing – e.g.:
Ø The possible impact of traffic and pollution remains a real issue. There can be no doubt that whilst many local residents currently drive away from the centre of Highams Park in order to do their main shopping and a large number within the ward would not need to go through the centre, a Tesco store would bring more vehicles into an area which is often congested, particularly when the crossing gates are down. The store would mean increased queues and, if approved, there would need to be very effective traffic management. Also, slower moving vehicles cause more pollution than those able to move more quickly so that in the centre there must be increased levels of pollution in prospect.
Ø The numbers of people living relatively near to the site who would walk and then return on foot carrying shopping may have been over-estimated.
Ø At various times assertions have been made regarding the likely impact on the existing local shopping centre – which has certainly declined over the years – for instance:
v “It will also improve comparison shopping facilities in Higham (sic) Park.” ; “Most other shops and services within Highams Park should benefit from spin off trade.” 5.31. and 6.30 – Proof of Evidence of P.Wilks
v “In my view the application proposal would have a demonstrably positive effect on Highams Park Centre.” – 6.1. (bottom of p.6) - A.Crowdy Summary
v “It will give a greater visual emphasis to the Highams Park shopping centre.” – 4.3. – D.Beardmore Summary
v “ – enhancing the viability and vitality of the centre.” 4.3. – M.Bedwell Summary
Ø Questioning concerning the above did not in my view substantiate the assertions either through statistics and projections or in the repeated requests for examples of locations where the arrival of a large store had demonstrably revitalised a comparable shopping centre.
Ø One “spin off” that Budgen’s store might well close has been admitted. This was also referred to in the GLA planning report PDU/0888a/01 (21.9.05. point 28): “The impact of a 32% trade diversion on the existing Budgens store in Highams Park could be profound, with an ultimate possibility of outright closure.”
Concluding remarks
9.1. As already pointed out, the community is divided on the issue of whether there should be a Tesco store with many welcoming the prospect of a large store and others having serious concerns – particularly relating to traffic, environment and future of the local shopping centre. These concerns are shared by the ward councillors.
9.2. The question is – should the scheme be approved? – and, if it is, are there conditions which deal adequately with these issues?
The Secretary of State has to decide whether Highams Park can both benefit from having the positive benefits of having such a store and not suffer the possible adverse consequences referred to above.
JDB – 12.1.07.]
1.1. Hale End & Highams Park ward is the area in the London Borough of Waltham Forest most affected by the proposals for a Tesco store on the former C & A site off Larkshall Road, Highams Park and the store’s location would itself be (just) within the ward boundary (see ward profile below). Most of Highams Park is located in the Hale End & Highams Park ward, although there is a substantial area in Hatch Lane ward and other parts in Larkswood ward and Chapel End ward.
1.2. Each of the 20 wards in Waltham Forest is represented by 3 councillors. I have undertaken the task of attending the Tesco Inquiry, but have of course regularly discussed the matter with my 2 fellow councillors.
1.3. From the time when the idea of a store was first reported, we, as local representatives, have sought the views of residents at regular intervals and encouraged people to contact us on this issue, whatever their views – by writing, phone or e-mail.
1.4. When the Public Inquiry was announced, I wrote (again) to the Planning Inspectorate in June of last year (20.6.06.), summarising the issues as we see them and indicating that I would want to attend the Public Inquiry and speak. This latest letter was acknowledged by the Planning Inspectorate on 27.6.06. (ref. APP/U5930/V/06/1198917).
1.5. I must emphasise that I see it as my task to represent the views of my constituents, which are very varied. There are local concerns, which we as local councillors share, about the implications of the scheme if it goes ahead and I shall refer to these issues in due course.
2. The Process
2.1. In my letter in June, I welcomed the prospect of a Public Inquiry as an opportunity for local people to have their say.
2.2. I regret that the format of a Public Inquiry (not a criticism of this Inquiry so much as of how the system
works in practice) is not exactly “user friendly” and can be perceived as rather intimidating, legalistic, etc.
2.3. Neverthleless, I hope all local people wishing to speak will be listened to and their differing views fully taken into account.
2.4. This Inquiry is perhaps unusual in that the applicant and the Council are “on the same side” and local residents who are opposed to the scheme hope that the outcome is not “a done deal”. It is not just a question of what “conditions” may be appropriate; for them the issue is whether or not this is a suitable location for such a development at all.
3. Local Opinion
3.1. When the possibility of a Tesco store was first reported in the local press in 2002, some residents were already concerned and contacted us.
At that stage, the Council replied to our request for information that “the Council has not received any proposals by Tesco, or indeed any developer, for the construction of a store on the above site.” Indeed at that stage the site was “currently designated as a Main Industrial Zone; the relevant policy - - encourages general industry, business uses and warehousing, but not retailing.”
3.2. In September, 2003, when the proposals were becoming a reality, our ward newsletter carried a survey under the headline: “Tesco – is it wanted in Highams Park?”. As we predicted, opinions in Highams Park are very sharply divided on this issue. There was a very narrow majority in favour of a Tesco store, but lots of concerns.
RESULTS OF SURVEY:
In favour of a Tesco store: 53% Against: 47%
Those who think such a development would be a threat to the viability of Highams Park shops: 60%
Those who think it would not be a threat: 36%
Don’t know: 4%
[NB this means that several who would welcome a Tesco store agree that it might harm H.Pk. shops]
Effect on future shopping patterns:
Would shop solely/mainly at Tesco: 30%
-- solely/mainly at H.Pk. shops 26%
-- both at Tesco & Highams Park 43%
-- elsewhere 28%
[some respondents chose more than one option – e.g. Tesco & elsewhere; so figures total more than 100]
POINTS IN FAVOUR
Convenience; choice; cheaper; local employment; would bring in people
PARTICULAR CONCERNS
Traffic & road safety; probability of local shop closures; loss of character in H.Pk.
Selection of comments:
“It would be very convenient for me – I would be delighted.”
“Tesco’s kills communities. All that gets left is second hand shops & fast food joints.”
“I think a big store in Highams Park would bring more trade to other shops and put Higha,ms Park on the map again for shopping like years ago.”
“We especially disapprove of more housing which will mean more pressure on schools, GPs, dentists, police, etc.”
“A development to be welcomed which would really bring Highams Park alive.”
“Encouraging more traffic constantly in and out of Tesco’s – is going to make Highams Park, if allowed, into one enormous traffic jam.”
3.3. The results of this survey were reported in January, 2004 (extracts above):
3.4. Since that survey, people have regularly contacted us with their views and we have encouraged them to do so.
3.5. It is clear from all the letters, reply-slips, surgery visits, phone-calls, conversations, e-mails, that opinion remains very divided - and it appears evenly divided - within the ward.
3.6. Recently, however, I have received a petition with 55 signatures in favour of a Tesco store. (Not all ward residents, but I do not consider that significant).
3.7. I have received a report of a residents’ meeting in the Vincent Road area. This says that opinion at that meeting was divided, about 50:50.
In favour of Tesco
4.1. Many local residents consider that there is a poor range of shops at Highams Park and some do not have a high opinion of the choice, range of goods and prices at existing (smaller) local supermarkets.
4.2. Consequently, many choose to go elsewhere to do their shopping.
4.3. They would welcome the convenience and positive benefits they believe a Tesco store would bring.
4.4. They point out that Tesco would bring choice, more favourable pricing and a much improved range of goods.
4.5. A Tesco store would bring local employment opportunities.
4.6. For those nearest to the site, they would welcome the chance to walk to a local large store.
4.7. Others would welcome the chance to park by the store and load up with their shopping.
4.8. Some – but not all of these – believe there would be a positive impact on the local shopping centre.
Opposing Tesco
5.1. There are already Tesco stores – quite apart from other large stores – only a mile or two away. To travel to these by car takes traffic away from the already congested centre of Highams Park.
5.2. There have been a good number of cases in the press where the arrival of a large store has had a very negative effect on the local shopping centre with loss of trade and business closures.
5.3. There are serious concerns about implications for traffic with the cars and lorries turning into and out of the site in such close proximity to the level crossing and road junctions where there are already sometimes long queues of traffic. Whatever schemes might be adopted, there is no denying that MORE cars will be drawn into Highams Park and exacerbate existing problems.
5.4. Queuing or very slow moving traffic is a major cause of pollution. It must be remembered that there are increasing rates of asthma in this country.
5.5. The idea that so many people will choose to walk to Tesco and carry shopping home is optimistic. In practice they may well find it more convenient to take the car and “load up”.
5.6. There are local concerns that some trees will be lost.
Other issue
6.1. People ask : IF the scheme were allowed, what could Tesco give back to the local community in helping with the traffic issues and perhaps providing community and/or leisure facilities??
Local knowledge
7.1. It cannot be expected that even expert witnesses will have the local knowledge of local people. Examples from the Inquiry to date:
Ø it is simply not the case that traffic moves away quickly when the crossing gates go up, particularly at peak times
Ø the possibility and convenience for local residents of reaching the Tesco store on the Southend Road (Woodford Green branch) by main roads in a short time had not been appreciated
Ø it is not considered locally that the practice of overtaking the queue for the level crossing (with gates down) in order to turn right into The Broadway is a safe procedure. Anyone stepping on to the pedestrian crossing near James Yard by the Guardian offices cannot easily see or be seen if traffic is overtaking
Ø The Tesco store in Ponders End - which could be available to residents particularly in NW Chingford after a drive of a mile or two – was not shown on the map.
7.2. The point here is simply to underlne the fact that the views of local residents, whatever their standpoint, do need to be listened to and heeded.
Matters arising from the Inquiry to date
8.1. Despite the large amount of evidence and the wealth of statistics, some of the assertions being made are not entirely convincing – e.g.:
Ø The possible impact of traffic and pollution remains a real issue. There can be no doubt that whilst many local residents currently drive away from the centre of Highams Park in order to do their main shopping and a large number within the ward would not need to go through the centre, a Tesco store would bring more vehicles into an area which is often congested, particularly when the crossing gates are down. The store would mean increased queues and, if approved, there would need to be very effective traffic management. Also, slower moving vehicles cause more pollution than those able to move more quickly so that in the centre there must be increased levels of pollution in prospect.
Ø The numbers of people living relatively near to the site who would walk and then return on foot carrying shopping may have been over-estimated.
Ø At various times assertions have been made regarding the likely impact on the existing local shopping centre – which has certainly declined over the years – for instance:
v “It will also improve comparison shopping facilities in Higham (sic) Park.” ; “Most other shops and services within Highams Park should benefit from spin off trade.” 5.31. and 6.30 – Proof of Evidence of P.Wilks
v “In my view the application proposal would have a demonstrably positive effect on Highams Park Centre.” – 6.1. (bottom of p.6) - A.Crowdy Summary
v “It will give a greater visual emphasis to the Highams Park shopping centre.” – 4.3. – D.Beardmore Summary
v “ – enhancing the viability and vitality of the centre.” 4.3. – M.Bedwell Summary
Ø Questioning concerning the above did not in my view substantiate the assertions either through statistics and projections or in the repeated requests for examples of locations where the arrival of a large store had demonstrably revitalised a comparable shopping centre.
Ø One “spin off” that Budgen’s store might well close has been admitted. This was also referred to in the GLA planning report PDU/0888a/01 (21.9.05. point 28): “The impact of a 32% trade diversion on the existing Budgens store in Highams Park could be profound, with an ultimate possibility of outright closure.”
Concluding remarks
9.1. As already pointed out, the community is divided on the issue of whether there should be a Tesco store with many welcoming the prospect of a large store and others having serious concerns – particularly relating to traffic, environment and future of the local shopping centre. These concerns are shared by the ward councillors.
9.2. The question is – should the scheme be approved? – and, if it is, are there conditions which deal adequately with these issues?
The Secretary of State has to decide whether Highams Park can both benefit from having the positive benefits of having such a store and not suffer the possible adverse consequences referred to above.
JDB – 12.1.07.]
Sunday, October 29, 2006
Water down the drain!
Help us beat the drought !
This is the slogan currently on the side of Thames Water vans! So people get understandably cross when they report water leaks and nothing seems to happen for ages. The long hot summer of 2006 was not a good year for Thames Water. Locally, thousands of gallons of water were lost through several leaks. Let's hope the new owners will learn from this year's lessons.
Health Services Campaign gathers momentum
GOOD RESPONSE TO LOCAL PETITION
On Saturday, 28th.October, there was a very good response to the NHS petition organised by Chingford & Woodford Green Liberal Democrats. Shoppers and passers-by at Chingford Mount were often queuing up to sign and nearly 450 signatures were collected.
The petition protests against local health cuts and urges that services should be maintained, particularly at WHIPPS CROSS HOSPITAL.
On Thursday, 26th.October, the Hawkey Hall, Woodford Green, was packed to hear platform speeches from NHS professionals - consultants, doctors, union reps. - and there were contributions from all 3 main political parties. An Action Group is being set up and there was a determination to SAVE WHIPPS CROSS.
Double yellow lines in place - at last - as long requested by local Lib Dems, to ease traffic & parking problems at the Chingford Lane/The Charter Rd. junction
Posted by Picasa
People were very keen to sign the petition on Saturday (28th.Oct.). Could you collect signatures locally? Please phone 8529-0741 if you can help.
Posted by Picasa
Sunday, October 22, 2006
BT acts on local protests
"NO SENSE OF DIRECTION"
SUCCESS AT LAST !
SUCCESS AT LAST !
BT has at last taken note of local protests and has announced that it is to merge the Redbridge & Chigwell and Waltham Forest editions of the phone book to create a new phone book called "Ilford & Walthamstow".
As reported under the headline "NO SENSE OF DIRECTION", in the last edition of Hale End & Highams Park FOCUS - the local newsletter of Chingford & Woodford Green Liberal Democrats in the area particularly affected* - BT had again this year delivered the Redbridge edition of the Phone Book to many homes in Waltham Forest in the Woodford Green area. *[The area affected also includes a part of Hatch Lane ward].
Cllr.John Beanse said:
"We have been protesting about this year after year and up to now BT had taken no notice. The problem is that the IG8 postal district goes across the border into Redbridge and someone at BT was determined that the whole of IG8 should receive Redbridge directories (because it was apparently too complicated for them to split a postal code area!), even though many of the residents live on the Waltham Forest side of the border! IG8 includes a sizeable chunk of Hale End & Highams Park ward plus a part of Hatch Lane ward plus part of Redbridge.
Again this year the Redbridge edition was delivered; again we protested. The official answer for this year is that if people want the Waltham Forest edition in addition to the Redbridge edition, they can phone free on 0800-833400, but will have to send £3.65 for postage and packing.
Now it is good news that at last BT has at last recognised the problem and, by combining the 2 directories, Woodford Green residents will get a much more useful publication in future."
The letter from BT to Cllr.Beanse states specifically:
"This means that residents in the Hale End and Highams Park ward will get a significantly more comprehensive and useful Phone Book from BT."
As reported under the headline "NO SENSE OF DIRECTION", in the last edition of Hale End & Highams Park FOCUS - the local newsletter of Chingford & Woodford Green Liberal Democrats in the area particularly affected* - BT had again this year delivered the Redbridge edition of the Phone Book to many homes in Waltham Forest in the Woodford Green area. *[The area affected also includes a part of Hatch Lane ward].
Cllr.John Beanse said:
"We have been protesting about this year after year and up to now BT had taken no notice. The problem is that the IG8 postal district goes across the border into Redbridge and someone at BT was determined that the whole of IG8 should receive Redbridge directories (because it was apparently too complicated for them to split a postal code area!), even though many of the residents live on the Waltham Forest side of the border! IG8 includes a sizeable chunk of Hale End & Highams Park ward plus a part of Hatch Lane ward plus part of Redbridge.
Again this year the Redbridge edition was delivered; again we protested. The official answer for this year is that if people want the Waltham Forest edition in addition to the Redbridge edition, they can phone free on 0800-833400, but will have to send £3.65 for postage and packing.
Now it is good news that at last BT has at last recognised the problem and, by combining the 2 directories, Woodford Green residents will get a much more useful publication in future."
The letter from BT to Cllr.Beanse states specifically:
"This means that residents in the Hale End and Highams Park ward will get a significantly more comprehensive and useful Phone Book from BT."
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
A colour conundrum
How green is blue - or red for that matter ?!
LABOUR MPs REJECT 'GREEN TAX SWITCH' - TORIES SIT ON HANDS
On Monday night Labour MPs voted down a Liberal Democrat call for a greener tax system, with the Conservatives abstaining, despite David Cameron's claims that the environment is a priority for him. The Lib Dem opposition day motion called on the Government "to increase green taxes on new high-emission cars and on aviation while using revenue generated to cut direct taxes, particularly on low earners, so that there is no overall rise in the burden of taxation." This debate showed how little the other parties have to offer on the environment. For all David Cameron's rhetoric, the Conservatives have not put forward a single specific policy on the environment, while Labour has been going backwards and has presided over a rise in carbon emissions. This makes the Liberal Democrats' Green Tax Switch campaign all the more important. It is vital that we continue to press the case for practical proposals to change our behaviour, benefiting those who change the most and making our society more sustainable.
On Monday night Labour MPs voted down a Liberal Democrat call for a greener tax system, with the Conservatives abstaining, despite David Cameron's claims that the environment is a priority for him. The Lib Dem opposition day motion called on the Government "to increase green taxes on new high-emission cars and on aviation while using revenue generated to cut direct taxes, particularly on low earners, so that there is no overall rise in the burden of taxation." This debate showed how little the other parties have to offer on the environment. For all David Cameron's rhetoric, the Conservatives have not put forward a single specific policy on the environment, while Labour has been going backwards and has presided over a rise in carbon emissions. This makes the Liberal Democrats' Green Tax Switch campaign all the more important. It is vital that we continue to press the case for practical proposals to change our behaviour, benefiting those who change the most and making our society more sustainable.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Lib Dems' Conference debate on the NHS
A report on the NHS debate at Brighton initiated by Chingford & Woodford Green Liberal Democrats is available on a national politics website. Click on
http://www.politics.co.uk/news/health/nhs/nhs-organisation/nhs-crisis-open-goal-lib-dems-$452433.htm There is more on the Conference if you scroll down and click on the archives for September 2006.
http://www.politics.co.uk/news/health/nhs/nhs-organisation/nhs-crisis-open-goal-lib-dems-$452433.htm There is more on the Conference if you scroll down and click on the archives for September 2006.
Save our Post Offices !
GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO SAVE POST OFFICES QUESTIONED BY THE LIB DEMS
Cllr.John Beanse today welcomed the special debate called by Liberal Democrats in Parliament on the future of Britain's post offices. He said: "We have already lost key branches in Waltham Forest and the service to the public is much worse than was once available. Now the Government seems to be determined to see another lot of post offices close. This misguided policy must stop. Post offices perform an important service for the public and that must be recognised. Any idea of closing more branches must be opposed and resisted strongly."
BACKGROUND:
The Liberal Democrats have put themselves at the head of a nationwide campaign to save Britain's post office network following the Government's failure to take the tough decisions necessary to save our post office and Royal Mail services. After reports in today's Financial Times that the DTI is set to back another major post office closure programme, the Lib Dems have used their Commons opposition day to call for urgent action.
Update - 18.10.06.
POST OFFICES: GOVERNMENT 'COMPLACENT' AS LIB DEM MOTION IS REJECTED
A Liberal Democrat motion expressing concern over the vulnerability of local post offices and calling on the Government to end the 'paralysis in decision-making' over the Post Office network and Royal Mail was rejected by the Government when the vote was taken in Parliament this week. MPs from all main parties criticised the Government during Monday's opposition day debate over the planned withdrawal of the post office card account and other issues, and called on the Government to bring forward plans for the future of the post office network urgently.Cllr.John Beanse commented: "The Labour party was very quick to condemn post office closures when in opposition. Now the situation is getting far worse and Government ministers appear to react with complacency."
Monday, October 16, 2006
Save our hospital !
Whipps Cross Hospital - we have to battle to maintain local health services for the benefit of the people of Waltham Forest - and western parts of Redbridge.
Posted by Picasa
Sunday, October 15, 2006
NHS Lessons to be learnt nationally and locally
MORE THAN HALF OF NHS BODIES NEED TO IMPROVE
More than half of NHS bodies in England need to improve the quality of their services or their financial management, the Healthcare Commission have found (see local information in report below). Primary Care Trusts fared particularly badly. Trust re-organisation was cited as possible reasons for the findings.
Lib Dem Shadow Health Secretary Steve Webb MP said: "This is a reality check for a Government which claims that NHS deficits are only a problem in a minority of cases. Crippling deficits are evidence of the chaos wrought across the NHS by the Government’s breakneck pace of reform. The NHS does not need more short term action plans, it needs a period of long-term stability, free from constant Government meddling."
Lib Dem Shadow Health Secretary Steve Webb MP said: "This is a reality check for a Government which claims that NHS deficits are only a problem in a minority of cases. Crippling deficits are evidence of the chaos wrought across the NHS by the Government’s breakneck pace of reform. The NHS does not need more short term action plans, it needs a period of long-term stability, free from constant Government meddling."
The Healthcare Commission said its "broad and tough" analysis showed the NHS needed to "raise its game". The body representing NHS managers said underperforming trusts could now focus on areas where improvement was needed. The "health check", which uses patient reports and hospital self-assessments as well as other financial and quality data to compile its rankings, replaces the discredited hotel-style "star ratings".
Factors assessed for the quality of service ranking included clinical care, meeting government targets and areas such as children's health, hospital acquired infection rates and community mental health care.
The financial management rating took into account both whether or not the NHS body had a deficit, but also how it ran its finances more generally
Factors assessed for the quality of service ranking included clinical care, meeting government targets and areas such as children's health, hospital acquired infection rates and community mental health care.
The financial management rating took into account both whether or not the NHS body had a deficit, but also how it ran its finances more generally
The commission found 51% of trusts were ranked "fair" for quality of services, while 9% were ranked "weak". And 47% were ranked "fair" for financial management, with 37% deemed "weak".
Cllr.John Beanse commented: "Locally it is no surprise that both Waltham Forest PCT and Whipps Cross are judged to be WEAK for financial management. The PCT was only FAIR for quality of services, but it is welcome news that Whipps Cross had a favourable GOOD for quality of services. This gives valuable support to the campaign to maintain services at this local hospital for the people of Waltham Forest - and also western parts of Redbridge of course. The PCT should take note of this result. Their strategy seems to be to ratchet down activity at Whipps in order to sort out their own financial problems. Whipps Cross deserves support."
Tory Talk
The NHS would be almost £10 billion worse off this year (or more than £1 million an hour) if the Tories had had their way. Current Tory attempts to champion the NHS should be treated with a healthy dose of scepticism.
Explanation
The extra money was raised through a specifically earmarked increase in National Insurance Contributions. This was contained in the National Insurance Contributions Bill 2002. The Tories opposed this increase.
House of Commons library estimates released recently (13th October 2006) are that this increase raised £7.2 billion in the first year (2003-4) rising to a projected £9.6 billion this year (2006-7). This is more than 10% of the total NHS budget in each case. This is money the NHS would not have had if the Tories had had their way.
Explanation
The extra money was raised through a specifically earmarked increase in National Insurance Contributions. This was contained in the National Insurance Contributions Bill 2002. The Tories opposed this increase.
House of Commons library estimates released recently (13th October 2006) are that this increase raised £7.2 billion in the first year (2003-4) rising to a projected £9.6 billion this year (2006-7). This is more than 10% of the total NHS budget in each case. This is money the NHS would not have had if the Tories had had their way.
Thursday, October 12, 2006
LOCAL HEALTH SERVICES - the verdict
Just published details of the quality of local health services from the HEALTHCARE COMMISSION are summarised below. For full information, click on www.healthcarecommission.org.uk . The easiest way to access the information is probably to click on Health Ratings, then the map for London (go to bottom of page to click on map) - go to Waltham Forest for Whipps Cross & Waltham Forest PCT; go to Redbridge to find NELMHT (our NE London Mental Health Trust) and Redbridge PCT.
Waltham Forest PCT
Quality of services
Overall score: Fair
Our assessment of the quality of services provided by this organisation highlighted areas for improvement.
Use of resources
Overall score: Weak
This organisation failed to demonstrate that it had adequate arrangements for managing its finances. Areas for improvement were identified.
Whipps Cross University Hospital Trust
Quality of services
Overall score: Good
There was evidence that the services provided by this organisation were of good quality.
Use of resources
Overall score: Weak This organisation failed to demonstrate that it had adequate arrangements for managing its finances. Areas for improvement were identified.
Redbridge PCT
Quality of services
Overall score: Fair
Our assessment of the quality of services provided by this organisation highlighted areas for improvement.
Use of resources
Overall score: Fair This organisation performed adequately with regard to its financial arrangements.
NELMHT
Quality of services
Overall score: Fair
Our assessment of the quality of services provided by this organisation highlighted areas for improvement.
Use of resources
Overall score: Fair
This organisation performed adequately with regard to its financial arrangements.
Waltham Forest PCT
Quality of services
Overall score: Fair
Our assessment of the quality of services provided by this organisation highlighted areas for improvement.
Use of resources
Overall score: Weak
This organisation failed to demonstrate that it had adequate arrangements for managing its finances. Areas for improvement were identified.
Whipps Cross University Hospital Trust
Quality of services
Overall score: Good
There was evidence that the services provided by this organisation were of good quality.
Use of resources
Overall score: Weak This organisation failed to demonstrate that it had adequate arrangements for managing its finances. Areas for improvement were identified.
Redbridge PCT
Quality of services
Overall score: Fair
Our assessment of the quality of services provided by this organisation highlighted areas for improvement.
Use of resources
Overall score: Fair This organisation performed adequately with regard to its financial arrangements.
NELMHT
Quality of services
Overall score: Fair
Our assessment of the quality of services provided by this organisation highlighted areas for improvement.
Use of resources
Overall score: Fair
This organisation performed adequately with regard to its financial arrangements.
Sunday, October 08, 2006
SAVE OUR LOCAL HEALTH SERVICES
It’s time to stand up for our NHS
The need to battle to save our local health services is now urgent. It’s time to stand up for our NHS.
Lib Dem Councillor John Beanse said: "Now is the time for local people to make their voices heard. Many years ago, several smaller local hospitals were closed; local protests were ignored in each case and almost everything was put on to the Whipps Cross site in the name of supposed efficiency. Now we seem to be being told that we cannot even have all these services in the borough any more. The future is uncertain.We recommend that people should write to the Health Secretary, Patricia Hewitt MP, and also to the Chief Executive of Waltham Forest Primary Care Trust to have their say. It is vital that people take a stand now before it is too late."
At the September meeting of the Health Scrutiny sub-committee, Lib Dem councillors spoke out strongly about the worrying situation at Whipps Cross Hospital and the prospects for the future - and members of all parties voiced their serious concerns.
* There have already been ward closures at Whipps and there is a plan to close an elderly persons’ ward in December! What if there is a flu epidemic?
* Closure of operating theatres and staff redundancies are part of the plan.
* Meanwhile there are reductions in community services as part of the strategy of the PCT (Primary Care Trust).
* The longer term prospects for Whipps are looking increasingly shaky with the real possibility of departments closing, so that local people would have to travel out of the borough to other hospitals.
Sunday, October 01, 2006
The Green Tax Switch
Tax pollution more - tax people less. Click on www.greentaxswitch.com to find out more.
Posted by Picasa
Tax pollution more, tax people less
THE GREEN TAX SWITCH
* £1,000 income tax cut for the average family* Switch Britain to more green taxes on pollution
* Airport tax on passengers to be scrapped - instead, each plane that takes off will be taxed on its emissions
* Drivers of greener cars will pay less
More information on www.greentaxswitch.com
